This website uses its own and third-party cookies. Some of these cookies are used to develop analytical statistics of visits to the webpage, others to manage advertising or even others are necessary for the correct management of the site. If you continue to browse or click in accept we consider you accept the conditions for their use. You can get more information, or learn how to change the settings in our cookies policy?
Versión Española Versión Mexicana Ibercampus English Version Version française Versione italiana

15/7/2020  
    Ibercampus  | Editorial Board | Who we are | Ideology | Contact | Advertising rates | Subscription | RSS RSS
Policies
Inclusion policies
R&D
Employment
Economics
Culture
Green strategies
Health
Society and consumer
Sports
Debates
Interviews
Education
Grants & internships
Training
Trends
Enterprises & CSR
 Enterprises & CSR
ACNUR
AEGON
AIR LIQUIDE
ALCATEL-LUCENT
ALLIANZ
ARCELORMITTAL
ASIFIN
ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI
AXA
BANCO SANTANDER
BASF
BAYER
BBVA
BNP PARIBAS
CARREFOUR
DAIMLER AG
DEUTSCHE BANK
DEUTSCHE BÖRSE
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM
E.ON
ENEL
ENI
FORTIS
FRANCE TÉLÉCOM
GROUPE DANONE
IBERDROLA
INDITEX
ING GROUP
INTESA SANPAOLO
L'ORÉAL
LVMH
MUNICH RE
NOKIA
PHILIPS
RENAULT
REPSOL YPF
RWE
SAINT GOBAIN
SANOFI-AVENTIS
SAP AG
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC
SIEMENS AG
SOCIÉTÉ GÉNÉRALE
SUEZ
TELECOM ITALIA
TELEFÓNICA
TOTAL S.A.
UNICREDIT
UNILEVER
VINCI
VIVENDI
VOLKSWAGEN

R&D
"Important corrective actions"

Human Brain Project (HBP) needs quick reform, according to an independent review


Europe´s flagship €1 billion Human Brain Project (HBP) needs quick reform, according to an independent review published by the Commission. "Important corrective actions" must be taken if the project is to continue meeting its objectives, the review says.
Ibercampus 12/3/2015 Send to a friend
Comparte esta noticia en TwitterFacebookTwitterdel.icio.usYahooRSS
The review followed a letter of protest last summer signed by 800 neuroscientists who claimed the Human Brain Project (HBP) had been taken over by computer scientists. Without directly referencing the letter, the review panel echoes many of its concerns.

A fuse was lit last May, when it became clear the project’s leaders intended to exclude studies on cognition from the future plan. For neuroscientists, this represented too much of a shift away from a biology project into a technology-dominated one.

The HBP is a hugely ambitious attempt involving 112 European institutions, which is attempting to create a computer model of the brain, down to the level of individual cells, within a ten-year timeframe. It is set to receive up to €1 billion in funding from the EU and national governments.

A second report on the state of the project by independent mediation committee, is expected to be released next week. Reforms must be put in place by June.

However, the managers of the HBP have launched a pre-emptive strike: heeding repeated calls to re-arrange the governance structure, it was announced last week that the project’s three-member executive committee, which the protest letter said was too powerful, has been dissolved.

From now on, decision making will be made by the 22-member governing board “[It’s] is a good thing [to do],” said Benedikt Berninger, a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz. “A project of this size requires to be handled in a more transparent way.”

Henry Markram, founder and leader of HBP said the report’s recommendations are “constructive”. “It will make the project stronger and move us even faster than we hoped in the direction of a permanent European research infrastructure – a CERN for the brain,” he said.

Scientist’s reactions

The HBP has caused a deep division in the neuroscience community. Scientists said while their fears have been confirmed by the Commission’s report, their concerns have not been dispelled.

“Many of the Commission’s recommendations validate the concerns we outlined in that letter, such as the inadequate management and governance structure, and the lack of engagement with the international scientific community outside of the project,” said James Bednar, the director of the Doctoral Training Centre in Neuroinformatics in the UK’s University of Edinburgh.

“Because I am a strong proponent of computational methods in brain science, I hope that the HBP will not fail, but given the risk factors I would not put any of my own money into betting that it would succeed,” Bednar added.

Moshe Abeles, a brain researcher from the Bar Ilan University in Israel, also found worth in the suggested reforms, but remains disillusioned with the HBP. “The demand that the organisers make less bombastic claims is justified – but I do not see that it changes anything practically,” he said.

Ad Aertsen, a neuroscientist at the University of Freiburg, and another signatory of the protest letter, said it is time to carefully re-start thinking on how to move neuroscience, instead of IT development, forward in Europe. “This time guided by rules of decent science,” he said.

Selling HBP to the public

In addition to the complaint that the HBP was being taken over by computer scientists, the open letter also protested about the way the project was sold to the public. The validity of this is recognised by the review panel’s report which says, “It is important for the HBP to better articulate its strategic goals and to communicate them in a clear and realistic way, within the HBP, to the wider scientific community and to the public, and to avoid at all costs creating unrealistic expectations.”

Despite acknowledging decent progress in some of the sub-projects, the panel calls for more effort to pull the whole project together saying, “It is clear that very significant efforts remain to be made, in terms of coordination and integration, for the HBP to become a truly large unified project.”

Source: Business Science

Other issues R&D
China, Germany, Japan, Korea and the United States dominate global innovation - WIPO report 2019
New methodology developed to monitor patients with glioblastoma
Scientists find a place on Earth where there is no life
The embryonic origin of the Cyclops eye
Graphene activates immune cells helping bone regeneration in mice
Jurassic dinosaurs could have been dispersed between Africa and Europe 145 years ago
China´s Chang´e-4 probe lands on the moon
Artificial intelligence for studying the ancient human populations of Patagonia.
Chinese and European scientists propose 28 complementary colours
EU-wide rules for safety of drones approved by European Parliament

Subscribe free to our newsletter
Human Capital
Mobilizing commitment around change
Marta Santos Romero
Vanity Fea
Let´s get serious with Coronavirus
José Ángel García Landa
We can all be leaders
VIDEOCOMMUTING A NEW ORGANIZATIONAL REALITY THAT POSITIVELY IMPACTS EMPLOYEES
Mar Souto Romero
Financial inclusion
Financial Education For All!
Carlos Trias
Brusselian Lights
European elections (I): which words are more used in the European political manifestos?
Raúl Muriel Carrasco
Humor and Political Communication
Comisión de Arbitraje, Quejas y Deontología (Spain) (3) You can´t be too careful
Felicísimo Valbuena
Want your own blog? Want to be read by universities?
Find out here
Books
"Tthe study of human behaviour was political from the beginning"
The EU "An Obituary"
Startup Cities "Why Only a Few Cities Dominate the Global Startup Scene"
Blockchain Revolution "How the Technology Behind Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Is Changing the World "
Doughnut Economics "Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist "
The People vs Tech "How the Internet Is Killing Democracy"
Theses and dissertations
1 Mobilizing commitment around change
Legal Advise | Privacy Policy | Editorial Board | Who we are | Ideology | Contact | Advertising rates | RSS RSS